View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research User Interviews | ![]() Business Strategy Value Chain Analysis | ![]() Innovation Design Thinking | ![]() Business Strategy VRIO Framework |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | Value Chain Analysis shows where value is created, costs accrue, and differentiation becomes possible along the process. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a value-chain map and lever list. | For complex user problems with an uncertain cause, the method connects observation, interpretation, and experiment into a learning cycle. It keeps the focus on real needs and avoids premature solution language. This produces robust decisions for product and service. | The VRIO Framework rates resources and capabilities on whether they are Valuable, Rare, Inimitable, and Organized. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and courses of action. The result is captured as a VRIO table and strategic actions. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | Half day | 1 Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 3-8 | 4-10 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Value Chain Map, Lever List | Problem Statement, Prototype, Test Learnings | VRIO Table, Strategic Actions |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | StrategyBusiness modelDiagnosisAnalysis | InnovationPrototypeResearch | StrategyDiagnosisBusiness modelCapability |



