methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Purposedifferent
When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
30–60 min per interview20-35 min1-4 Wochen25-40 min
Participantsdifferent
1 participant per interview1-53-10 Kunden1-5
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryTest Card with a pre-set thresholdConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksLearning Card with evidence and next action
Tags1 shared
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning
Add more methods