View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Problem Framing Workshop |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When a team works on symptoms but the real question stays fuzzy, a Problem Framing Workshop sharpens the view of the right problem. It separates observation, interpretation, and target picture from each other. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 60-120 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-10 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Problem Statement, Scope Boundaries, Assumption List, Next Analysis Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | FacilitationAlignmentDiscovery | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |