View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  Operations Kaizen Event |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Operations PDCA Cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | For a tightly scoped process segment with noticeable waste, the method bundles shared energy for change. It suits situations that call for fast learning loops and visible adjustments. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | For an improvement that still has to prove itself in everyday work, the method runs it through small learning loops. It connects planning, checking, and standardization into a repeatable learning mode. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 0.5-5 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview | 1 h bis mehrere Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 4-10 | 5-12 Interviews | 1-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Kaizen Charter, Waste List, Improvement Experiments, Standard Work Update | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | PDCA Log, Experiment Plan, Learning Outcome, Standard Change |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | LeanContinuous improvementOperations | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | Continuous improvementLeanExperiments |