View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  UX Research Customer Journey Mapping |  Product Discovery Opportunity Scoring |  UX Design Customer Journey Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When a user journey falls apart across many touchpoints, customer journey mapping makes the experience visible as a coherent arc. Phases, emotions, and breaks become legible enough to prioritize critical moments deliberately. | When opportunities need ranking by their effect, it makes importance and satisfaction directly comparable. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as an opportunity-score table and top outcomes. | When a journey needs to be understood across several phases, it arranges experience, touchpoints, and opportunities into one picture. It makes gaps and friction along the user path clear. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 2-4 h | 60-120 min | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 4-10 | 3-6 | 3-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Journey Map, Pain-point List, Opportunity Backlog | Opportunity Score Table, Top Outcomes | Customer Journey Canvas, Pain Points, Experience Opportunities |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | JourneyServiceService design | PrioritizationDiscoveryOutcomesNeeds | JourneyCustomerService designCanvas |