methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
30–60 min per interview120 min initial, dann laufend20-35 min1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
1 participant per interview3-61-5Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryHEART-GSM Table, DashboardTest Card with a pre-set thresholdClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods