View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  UX Design Lean UX Canvas |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | The Lean UX Canvas helps clarify user behavior, touchpoints, and concept decisions. It makes assumptions and desired outcomes visible and captures the result as a completed canvas, hypothesis list, and first experiment. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 1-3 h | 2-3 h | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 2-8 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Completed Lean UX Canvas, Hypothesis list, First experiment | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | CanvasHypothesisOutcomesDiscovery | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |