View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Product Discovery Opportunity Interview |  Product Discovery Learning Card |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When opportunities are still hidden behind signals of need, it structures conversations around needs and obstacles. It looks for patterns that lead to new product opportunities. | The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | 1-5 Tage | 30-60 min je Interview | 25-40 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | Nutzertraffic | 5-12 Interviews | 1-5 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Interview Notes, Opportunity Themes, Customer Quotes | Learning Card with evidence and next action |
Tags1 shared | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | DiscoveryInterviewsOpportunityCustomer | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning |