methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration of a Test Card with four fields for hypothesis, test, metric, and success threshold.
Product Discovery
Test Card
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Purposedifferent
When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
30–60 min per interview30-60 min20-35 min90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
1 participant per interview2-101-54-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogTest Card with a pre-set thresholdDecision Rights Matrix, Agreement
Tagsno overlap
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
Add more methods