methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
Paper illustration for DACI
Decision Making
DACI
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Paper illustration for RAPID
Decision Making
RAPID
Purposedifferent
When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.In complex management decisions, clarity is often missing about who recommends, who agrees, and who makes the decision. RAPID creates this assignment and stabilizes decisions across several levels.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
30–60 min per interview30-60 min1-2 h45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1 participant per interview2-102-83-12
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryDACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision LogDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning reportRAPID Role Map, Recommendation, Decision Log
Tagsno overlap
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
DecisionRolesGovernance
Add more methods