View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research User Interviews |  Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  UX Research HEART Framework |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible. | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30–60 min per interview | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 1-2 Tage | 120 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 1 participant per interview | 4-12 | 10-50 | 3-6 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interview Notes, Themes, Insight Summary | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard |
Tagsno overlap | QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery | StrategyMetricsExecution | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction |