methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of two people facing each other, speech bubbles and an open interview notebook.
UX Research
User Interviews
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper notes move from an inbox to action, project and calendar collections.
Operations
Getting Things Done
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When teams derive needs only from assumptions and real motives are missing, user interviews give direct access to behavior and meaning. Conversations from the target group's everyday life make patterns, tensions, and open questions solidly visible.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30–60 min per interview45-90 min1-2 h Setup, laufend10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
1 participant per interview2-511
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Interview Notes, Themes, Insight SummaryA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisAction Lists, Project List, Review RoutineDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
QualitativeResearchCustomerDiscovery
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods