methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a participant using a prototype while an observer takes notes beside a highlighted usability issue.
UX Research
Usability Testing
Paper illustration for Smoke Test.
Product Discovery
Smoke Test
Paper illustration of Lean Startup with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Lean Startup
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When a product is built but people get stuck on tasks, usability testing shows the friction at concrete points. Observed use instead of self-report makes visible where orientation, understanding, or interaction breaks down.When demand only needs to be roughly verified, it tests interest with minimal effort. It measures whether people would take a next step at all.For uncertain business assumptions, the method forces the idea into contact with real market reactions early. It separates wishful picture, assumption, and observable behavior, so that learning becomes faster than planning. This translates uncertainty into measurable insight.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 h je Session1-5 TageWochen bis Monate je Lernzyklus1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Based on research questionNutzertraffic2-8Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Usability Issues, Severity List, RecommendationsInterest Metrics, Conversion Signal, Learning NoteHypothesis list, MVPs, Learning reports, Pivot or persevere decisionClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tags1 shared
ValidationUXPrototype
ValidationExperimentsDemandGrowth
LeanStartupValidationMVP
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods