methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for Solution Interview
Product Discovery
Solution Interview
Paper illustration for Problem Interview
Product Discovery
Problem Interview
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When a solution idea is already on the table, it checks how it is understood and evaluated. It looks for resonance, objections, and missing fit early in the conversation.When the picture of the problem still needs to become solid, it asks about real situations and consequences. It separates genuine suffering from mere interest in a solution.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage30-60 min je Interview30-60 min je Interview1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question5-10 Interviews5-12 Interviews10-30
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IASolution Feedback, Objection List, Validation NotesProblem Evidence, Risk Notes, Customer SegmentsClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design Recommendations
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
ValidationInterviewsPrototype
DiscoveryInterviewsValidation
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
Add more methods