methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration of MVP Test Matrix with a method-specific labelled workspace.
Product Discovery
MVP Test Matrix
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Paper illustration of a Learning Card with four fields for hypothesis, observation, insight, and action.
Product Discovery
Learning Card
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.The Learning Card connects traceable test results to a reasoned next action while keeping the limits of the insight visible.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage45-75 min1-5 Tage25-40 min
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question2-8Nutzertraffic1-5
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IATest Matrix, Test PlanClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning DecisionLearning Card with evidence and next action
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryLearning
Add more methods