View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Facilitation Mind Mapping |  Innovation Design Sprint |  Innovation Crazy 8s |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When a topic is still unclear and too many thoughts surface at once, Mind Mapping creates an open surface for ordering them. It makes connections, subtopics, and starting points visible without fixing them too early. | When the product question is unclear and time pressure is high, the method takes a team from an open idea to a testable solution. It connects problem understanding, decision, and learning in one compact format, lowering the risk of spending a lot of energy on a mere guess. | With only a few minutes available and a still-fuzzy solution search, the method forces a wide range of variants. It produces fast sketches before the first idea can settle in, making different directions directly comparable and open to further development. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 15-45 min | 4-5 Tage | 8-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 1-10 | 5-8 | 1-10 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Mind Map, Topic Clusters, Open Questions | Prototype, Test Findings, Decision Rationale | Sketch Set, Idea Shortlist, Direction Options |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationFindability | BrainstormingIdeasMappingStructureFacilitation | Design sprintPrototypeValidationInnovation | BrainstormingSketchingSpeedDivergenceDesign sprint |