methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage45-90 min1-2 Tage1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question3-810-302-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Add more methods