methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage120 min initial, dann laufend1-2 h90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question3-64-123-6
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAHEART-GSM Table, DashboardAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision QuestionsGQM Table, Metric Profiles
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Add more methods