methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 h1-2 Tage45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question2-810-303-8
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
Add more methods