View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Domain Modeling Domain Context Map |  UX Research Contextual Inquiry |  Domain Modeling Bounded Context Canvas |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | When a domain model and its associated contexts need to be thought through together, it creates a shared overview. It connects the business view and organizational boundary into a readable whole. | When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise. | When a business context is still loosely outlined, it shapes language, responsibility, and integration space. It clarifies what belongs together and where a boundary needs to hold. |
Complexitysame | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 1-3 h | 1-3 Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 3-10 | 4-12 Beobachtungen | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Domain Context Map, Boundary Notes, Ownership Map | Field Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain Points | Context Canvas, Glossary, Integration Notes |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationFindability | Domain-Driven DesignContextBoundaries | UX researchObservationContext | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesModeling |