methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for Contextual Inquiry.
UX Research
Contextual Inquiry
Paper illustration for Diary Study.
UX Research
Diary Study
A paper-based illustration representing Context Canvas with its core stages and visible working result.
Product Discovery
Context Canvas
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When work processes are known only from accounts and the real context stays hidden, Contextual Inquiry makes behavior at the workplace visible. Observation and follow-up questions together show how people actually work, get interrupted, and improvise.When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory.When an environment of users, systems, and constraints is hard to grasp, it puts the context compactly on the table. It creates a clear reading of influence, boundary, and dependency.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-3 Wochen1-4 Wochen45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question4-12 Beobachtungen5-203-10
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAField Notes, Workflow Insights, Pain PointsDiary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience TimelineContext canvas, Open questions, Shared context notes
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
UX researchObservationContext
UX researchTrackingBehavior
ContextFramingRequirementsCanvas
Add more methods