methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of a branching category tree with a highlighted search path and possible dead ends.
UX Research
Tree Testing
Paper illustration for Concierge MVP
Product Discovery
Concierge MVP
First-click Testing method illustration showing its working structure
UX Research
First-click Testing
Paper illustration for Fake Door Test
Product Discovery
Fake Door Test
Purposedifferent
When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination.When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution.When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together.When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 Tage1-4 Wochen1-2 Tage1-5 Tage
Participantsdifferent
Based on research question3-10 Kunden10-30Nutzertraffic
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IAConcierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP RisksClick Heatmap, Success Rate, Design RecommendationsClick Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision
Tagsno overlap
Information architectureNavigationFindability
MVPValidationServiceDiscovery
UXNavigationFindabilityValidation
ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery
Add more methods