View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research Tree Testing |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |  UX Research First-click Testing |  Product Discovery Concierge MVP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a navigation exists but search paths still fail, tree testing checks findability without visual distraction. The method shows whether labels, levels, and paths really lead to the intended destination. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. | When users immediately turn the wrong way on a screen or wireframe, first click testing checks initial orientation at high speed. The first click shows early whether expectation, labeling, and wayfinding fit together. | When an idea can first fail or grow through genuine hands-on support, it relies on manual work instead of automation. It shows whether user value holds up even under manual execution. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-2 Tage | 45-90 min | 1-2 Tage | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | Based on research question | 2-8 | 10-30 | 3-10 Kunden |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Findability Metrics, Path Analysis, Revised IA | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan | Click Heatmap, Success Rate, Design Recommendations | Concierge Learnings, Service Blueprint, MVP Risks |
Tagsno overlap | Information architectureNavigationFindability | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery | UXNavigationFindabilityValidation | MVPValidationServiceDiscovery |