methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for TOWS Matrix.
Business Strategy
TOWS Matrix
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Purposedifferent
The TOWS Matrix connects internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats into action-oriented strategies. It goes a step further than a pure stocktaking.GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
1-2 hWochen bis Monate je Goal30-90 min1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
3-103-101-62-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
TOWS Matrix, Strategic Options, Priority ActionsGoals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListGap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
StrategyAnalysisOptions
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
DecisionTreeOptions
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Add more methods