View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Timeline |  Product Discovery Kano Model |  Facilitation Decision Jam |  Delivery Cost of Delay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a project, incident, or change process is only remembered in fragments, Timeline brings the sequence back into a readable form. It makes turning points, precursors, and after-effects recognizable over the course of time. | When features need to be distinguished by their effect on satisfaction, it makes expectations and surprises comparable. It separates basic needs, performance contribution, and delight. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | Helps clarify scope, order, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, constraints, and sequence manageable. The result is captured as a Cost of Delay table and prioritization sequence. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 1-2 Tage | 60-90 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 10-50 | 4-10 | 3-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Timeline, Milestones, Insight Notes | Kano Matrix, Feature Classes, Priority Themes | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | CoD Table, Prioritization Sequence |
Tagsno overlap | TimelineFacilitationSequence | SatisfactionPrioritizationCustomer | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | PrioritizationDeliveryEconomicsDecision |