View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Facilitation Timeline |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Architecture Views and Beyond |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When a project, incident, or change process is only remembered in fragments, Timeline brings the sequence back into a readable form. It makes turning points, precursors, and after-effects recognizable over the course of time. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-90 min | 15-45 min | 60-90 min | 1-3 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-12 | 1-3 | 3-6 | 1-4 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Timeline, Milestones, Insight Notes | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | TimelineFacilitationSequence | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture |