methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Time Blocking
Operations
Time Blocking
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Purposedifferent
With a calendar that grows on request, the method makes available time explicit again. It combines appointments, focus work, and buffer into a more realistic day structure.When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
15-30 min Planung, laufend10-20 min60-120 min5-15 min
Participantsdifferent
14-100+5-123-20
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Blocked Calendar, Capacity View, Focus PlanIdea List, Shared Insights, Emergent ThemesRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityRanked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist
Tagsno overlap
PlanningTime managementFocus
FacilitationInclusionIdeation
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
Add more methods