methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Three-Point Estimation.
Decision Making
Three-Point Estimation
Paper illustration for NoEstimates.
Agile
NoEstimates
Paper illustration for Story Points.
Agile
Story Points
Paper illustration for PERT Estimation.
Decision Making
PERT Estimation
Purposedifferent
A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes.When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules.When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data.On complex initiatives, a plain average tends to understate just how uncertain the outcome really is. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a PERT Estimate, Expected Value, and Risk Notes.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
10-30 min je Itemlaufendlaufend, 1-5 min je Item15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
1-82-123-91-8
Formatsame
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption NotesThroughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing RulesPoint Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity DataPERT Estimate, Expected Value, Risk Notes
Tags1 shared
EstimationUncertaintyForecasting
EstimationForecastingFlow
EstimationAgileMeasurement
EstimationUncertaintyRisk
Add more methods