View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Decision Making Three-Point Estimation |  Operations Getting Things Done |  Agile NoEstimates |  Operations Weekly Review |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes. | With many open commitments and ideas in daily life, a reliable external storage system emerges. The method relieves the mind so priority and context don't have to compete in memory. | When estimating slows a team down more than it helps, it shifts the focus to flow, small slices, and real lead time. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, and Slicing Rules. | In a week with many open loops, the method creates distance from operational noise. It organizes commitments, calendar, and projects so the next week becomes workable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 10-30 min je Item | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | laufend | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-8 | 1 | 2-12 | 1 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption Notes | Action Lists, Project List, Review Routine | Throughput Data, Flow Forecast, Slicing Rules | Updated Task System, Weekly Focus, Next Actions |
Tagsno overlap | EstimationUncertaintyForecasting | ProductivityPlanningTasksExecution | EstimationForecastingFlow | ProductivityExecutionPlanning |