methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Three-Point Estimation.
Decision Making
Three-Point Estimation
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Scenario Planning method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
Scenario Planning
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Purposedifferent
A single estimate for effort, time, or risk often looks too smooth for the real uncertainty behind it. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, and Assumption Notes.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
10-30 min je Item30-90 min0.5-2 Tage45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
1-81-64-123-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Three-Point Estimate, Risk Range, Assumption NotesDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListScenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust OptionsForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes
Tagsno overlap
EstimationUncertaintyForecasting
DecisionTreeOptions
StrategyUncertaintyPlanning
ChangeDecisionStrategy
Add more methods