methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Three Horizons with its method-specific working model.
Business Strategy
Three Horizons
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Purposedifferent
Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ5-15 min1-3 h30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-123-205-301-5
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource planRanked list, Consensus signal, ShortlistConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority AreasABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List
Tagsno overlap
StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
Add more methods