View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy Three Horizons | ![]() Domain Modeling Context Map | ![]() Systems Thinking Systems Mapping | ![]() Systems Thinking Leverage Points |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Three Horizons helps clarify strategic options across different timeframes. It compares strengths, risks, market logic, and investment choices, and captures the result as a horizon map, portfolio view, and initiatives per horizon. | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. | Systems Mapping arranges elements, relationships, and boundaries so a complex field becomes legible at a glance. The overview stabilizes the overall picture before detail work or steering begins. | Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | Halbtags-Workshop, dann iterativ | 1-3 h | 1-3 h | Half day |
Participantsdifferent | 3-12 | 2-8 | 3-12 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Horizon map, Portfolio view, Initiatives per horizon, Resource plan | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes | System Map, Dependencies, Leverage Points | Leverage Map, Action Strategy |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyInnovationPortfolioForesight | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy | Systems thinkingMappingBoundariesChange | Systems thinkingChangeStrategy |



