View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Three Amigos |  Facilitation Team Charter |  Agile Specification by Example |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-30 min | 2-4 h | 60-90 min pro Feature | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3 | 3-12 | 3-6 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes | Example Table, Acceptance Tests | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | TeamAlignmentCollaboration | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development | TeamCollaborationAgile |