View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Three Amigos |  Facilitation Stakeholder Mapping |  Agile Example Mapping |  Facilitation Power Interest Grid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When an initiative depends on many people, interests, and power dynamics, Stakeholder Mapping systematically orders the environment. It shows who influences, who is affected, and where relationship management or safeguarding matters first. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | When many stakeholders compete for attention at once, the Power Interest Grid sorts them by influence and stake. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Power Interest Grid and a stakeholder-specific strategy. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-30 min | 60–90 min | 30-60 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3 | 2-8 | 3-7 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Stakeholder Map, Engagement Plan, Risk Notes | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Power Interest Grid, Strategy per Stakeholder |
Tagsno overlap | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | StakeholdersAlignmentFacilitationChange | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentPlanning |