View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Three Amigos |  Decision Making DACI |  Agile Example Mapping |  Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 15-30 min | 30-60 min | 30-60 min | 90-180 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3 | 2-10 | 3-7 | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement |
Tagsno overlap | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility |