View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Agile Three Amigos |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Agile Acceptance Criteria Workshop |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When a story needs clear checkpoints before implementation, it sharpens expectation and scope together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Acceptance Criteria and a Story Update. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-30 min | 1-2 h | 20-40 min pro Story | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3 | 1-8 | 3-6 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Acceptance Criteria, Story Update | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | AgileRequirementsRefinementBehavior-Driven Development | TeamCollaborationAgile |