View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Agile Three Amigos | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping | ![]() Agile ROAM Board | ![]() Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When story, test, and implementation could drift apart, it brings business perspective, engineering, and quality together early. It prevents a story from being read differently only late in the process. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 15-30 min | 1-2 h | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3 | 4-12 | 3-15 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Clarified Story, Test Examples, Open Questions | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | ROAM Board, Owner List | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | CollaborationBehavior-Driven DevelopmentQualityRefinement | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |



