methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Theory of Constraints.
Operations
Theory of Constraints
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Paper illustration for Sailboat Retrospective
Agile
Sailboat Retrospective
Purposedifferent
For a system that does not get faster despite effort, the method directs attention to the bottleneck. It concentrates improvement on the point that actually limits throughput.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.When a team wants to read momentum, brakes, and risks together, it offers an easily understandable picture of the situation. It makes drive, obstacles, and headwind visible in the same picture.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h Analyse, laufend10-20 min daily30-60 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
3-1213-124-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Constraint Map, Improvement Plan, Flow MetricsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement ActionsSailboat Board, Risks, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
OperationsConstraintsFlowImprovement
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
RetrospectiveTeamImprovement
Add more methods