View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Test Card |  Decision Making Force Field Analysis |  Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |  Product Strategy DIBB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. | In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. |
Complexitysame | Low | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | 20-35 min | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 3-12 | 1-5 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Test Card with a pre-set threshold | Force Field Map, Change Levers, Risk Notes | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | ChangeDecisionStrategy | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis |