View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Product Discovery Test Card |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |  Product Discovery MVP Test Matrix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Test Card turns a critical assumption into a testable claim and specifies in advance which result counts as success. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. | When several minimal variants compete to answer the same question, it makes comparing and choosing between them cleaner. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Test Matrix and a Test Plan. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 20-35 min | 5-15 min | 1-5 Tage | 45-75 min |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 3-20 | Nutzertraffic | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Test Card with a pre-set threshold | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision | Test Matrix, Test Plan |
Tagsno overlap | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryOptions |