methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team Topologies Interaction Modes with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team Topologies Interaction Modes
Paper illustration for Working Agreements.
Agile
Working Agreements
Paper illustration for Planning Poker.
Agile
Planning Poker
Paper illustration of Spotify Model Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Spotify Model Mapping
Purposedifferent
When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements.When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths.When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions.When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
Half day45-90 min2-5 min je Item90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
Team-Leads plus Architecture3-123-95-15
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per PairWorking Agreements, Team Norms, Review CadenceRelative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split CandidatesSpotify Model Map, Action List
Tags1 shared
TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization
TeamCollaborationAgile
EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam
TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis
Add more methods