methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team Topologies Interaction Modes with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team Topologies Interaction Modes
Paper illustration of Team API with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team API
Paper illustration for Working Agreements.
Agile
Working Agreements
Paper illustration for Expectation Mapping.
Facilitation
Expectation Mapping
Purposedifferent
When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements.When expectations between teams stay fuzzy, it describes how a team can be reached, used, and held accountable. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Team API document.When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths.When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Half dayHalf day initial, dann laufend45-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
Team-Leads plus ArchitectureEin Team plus Stakeholder3-123-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per PairTeam API DocumentWorking Agreements, Team Norms, Review CadenceExpectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements
Tags1 shared
TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization
TeamAlignmentCommunicationService
TeamCollaborationAgile
AlignmentStakeholdersTeam
Add more methods