View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Team Topologies Interaction ModesStakeholder Salience ModelExpectation MappingAlignment Mapping
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Facilitation Stakeholder Salience Model |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When stakeholders appear to matter very differently, the Stakeholder Salience Model rates their actual priority through power, legitimacy, and urgency. It turns individual contributions into a visible selection. The result is captured as a Salience diagram and a class-based strategy. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Half day | 60-90 min | 45-90 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-6 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Salience Diagram, Strategy per Class | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tags1 shared | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | StakeholdersFacilitationAlignmentGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |