View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
Selected:Team Topologies Interaction ModesSoft Systems MethodologyExpectation MappingAlignment Mapping
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Systems Thinking Soft Systems Methodology |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | Soft Systems Methodology helps explore unclear or politically charged problems systematically. Instead of forcing a quick answer, the method builds a shared understanding of perspectives and room for action. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | High | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Half day | 0.5-3 Tage | 45-90 min | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 5-15 | 3-12 | 4-12 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Rich Picture, Root Definitions, Conceptual Models, Change Agenda | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | Soft systemsComplexitySensemakingSystems thinking | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |