View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Agile ROAM Board |  Knowledge Modeling Concept Mapping |  Agile Working Agreements |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | Concept Mapping arranges terms and relationships in a network that makes subject-matter connections tangible. It fits when a topic needs to be understood structurally rather than linearly. | When collaboration needs more than implicit expectations, it lays out shared ground rules openly. It creates reliability for conduct, availability, and decision paths. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-15 | 1-8 | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | ROAM Board, Owner List | Concept Map, Relationship Labels, Knowledge Gaps | Working Agreements, Team Norms, Review Cadence |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | KnowledgeConceptsMappingSensemaking | TeamCollaborationAgile |