View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Agile ROAM Board |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-15 | 4-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | ROAM Board, Owner List | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | RAID Log, Status Report Source |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance |