View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 45-90 min | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-12 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |