View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Facilitation Expectation Mapping |  Delivery RAID Log |  Facilitation Team Charter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When roles, interfaces, or projects fail because of differing expectations, Expectation Mapping surfaces these differences. It shows what each side takes for granted and where the pictures diverge. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | When a team is starting fresh or working past each other, Team Charter clarifies the shared working basis. It visibly sets out how collaboration, decision paths, and mutual conduct should work day to day. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | Half day | 45-90 min | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 2-4 h |
Participantsdifferent | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-12 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 3-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Expectation Map, Alignment Notes, Agreements | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Team Charter, Working Norms, Role Notes |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | AlignmentStakeholdersTeam | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | TeamAlignmentCollaboration |