View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Team Design Team Topologies Interaction Modes |  Agile Affinity Estimation |  Team Design Spotify Model Mapping |  Agile Planning Poker |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements. | When many tasks need to be classified quickly, it sorts them by perceived effort and similarity. It reduces the effort of fine-grained estimation for large volumes. | When a team landscape has grown without clear grouping, it maps roles and relationships onto the Spotify model. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as a Spotify model map and action list. | When estimates within the team diverge too much, it puts differing expectations on a common test bench. It separates rough complexity from unspoken assumptions. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Half day | 30-90 min | 90-180 min | 2-5 min je Item |
Participantsdifferent | Team-Leads plus Architecture | 3-12 | 5-15 | 3-9 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per Pair | Affinity Size Map, Grouped Estimates, Unclear Items | Spotify Model Map, Action List | Relative Estimates, Assumption Notes, Split Candidates |
Tagsno overlap | TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization | EstimationBacklogRelative sizing | TeamOrganizationAlignmentDiagnosis | EstimationAgileRelative sizingTeam |