methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Team Topologies Interaction Modes with its method-specific working model.
Team Design
Team Topologies Interaction Modes
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration of the McKinsey 7S Framework with seven connected fields
Business Strategy
McKinsey 7S
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
When several teams collaborate repeatedly, it describes the right interaction mode for each interface between them. It clarifies responsibility, interaction, and load between teams. The result is captured as an interaction heat map and pairwise agreements.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.McKinsey 7S checks whether Strategy, Structure, Systems, Shared Values, Skills, Style, and Staff fit together. Organizational misalignments become visible across multiple levers as a result.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Half day20-45 min2-4 h1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
Team-Leads plus Architecture1-83-124-12
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Interaction Heat Map, Agreements per PairOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching Notes7S Assessment, Alignment Gaps, Change ActionsAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
TeamAlignmentCollaborationOrganization
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
OrganizationStrategyAlignmentChange
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods